Debrief

Aliases

How People Use ChatGPT; NBER 34255; Asking Doing Expressing

Citation Status
Verified
Cited in Generated Atlas
1
Design Consequence

Write key claims as self-contained, source-linked units and provide an AI-readable context packet that preserves voice, evidence, boundaries, and depth routes.

Full Citation

Chatterji, A., Cunningham, T., Deming, D. J., Hitzig, Z., Ong, C., Shan, C. Y., & Wadman, K. (2025). How People Use ChatGPT. NBER Working Paper 34255. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34255

Source Class
Canonical
Themes
Communication MethodGoal-Directed & Verification
The Snag

A public artifact may reach a decision-maker through an assistant’s interpretation while its key claims depend on nearby prose or implicit context.

The Move

Test whether an assistant can summarize the artifact while preserving role, consequence, evidence, uncertainty, and person-specific voice.

The Cure

Give human and AI readers a shared spine with stable labels, quotable claims, evidence classes, and explicit continuation routes.

The Read

The study classifies a large sample of ChatGPT use into Asking, Doing, and Expressing, with Asking forming a large share. Public professional material may therefore be interpreted through an assistant before direct reading.