Research Payload Family — Dry Runs
research-payload-candidates/ai-evaluation-field-testing-monitoring@0.1.0
Public dry-run receipt recording the AI-system context, immutable candidate input, reached evidence, deviations, evidence ceiling, revise decision, and remaining promotion gaps.
v0.1.0
Receipt standing: accepted as a bounded synthetic dry run. The run produced a substantive worked specimen, exposed focused revisions, and leaves the payload in candidate status.
Payload identity
Field | Receipt |
Semantic identifier | research-payload-candidates/ai-evaluation-field-testing-monitoring |
Candidate version exercised | 0.1.0 |
Candidate body SHA-256 | aa2f4eb507241c0b7c9bde98f61498d1d34fc273f6c1be8061ef87004eab7199 |
Candidate body size | 9,270 UTF-8 bytes |
Candidate retrieved | 2026-10-02 |
Candidate route | |
Specimen route |
The digest identifies the candidate body exercised before the focused v0.1.1 refinement. The stable public route continues to resolve the current candidate.
Invocation
Field | Value |
Run ID | AIRPM-DRY-001 |
Run date | 2026-10-02 |
Mode | Public-safe synthetic dry run |
Context | Fictional, low-stakes workshop FAQ drafting assistant |
Receiving decision | Expand beyond synthetic rehearsal, or revise and repeat |
Harness | Multi-agent research and synthesis session using the candidate payload, official public sources, and a declared synthetic fixture set |
Provider/product | OpenAI Codex |
Model record | GPT-5 family; exact service build unavailable to this durable page |
Tools | Notion workspace operations, public web research, deterministic fixture arithmetic |
Disclosure | Entirely synthetic; inputs comprise fictional fixtures and public sources. Participant, production, credential, and proprietary data remain outside the run. |
Coverage state
Evidence horizon | State | Observable return |
Controlled evaluation | observed_synthetic | 72 declared fixtures |
Bounded field test | observed_synthetic | 40 scripted field-like sessions |
Deployed monitoring | observed_synthetic | 120-request, 14-day replay |
Material change | observed_synthetic | G1 → G2 source update and missed automatic alert |
Recovery | observed_synthetic | Repair plus 16-fixture recovery replay |
Affected-population experience | unavailable | Authorized participant study remains the fitting observation |
Real deployment behavior | unavailable | Production operation remains a separate evidence event |
Independent review | unavailable | Fitting review remains a promotion requirement |
Material result
The run establishes that the candidate can carry one named context across controlled evaluation, field-like rehearsal, monitoring design, a material-change incident, recovery, a coverage ledger, and a bounded decision. Human review contained both stale drafts before simulated release. Automatic source-change detection produced zero alerts because relevant traces omitted the source version.
Its evidence ceiling is control-flow coherence under declared synthetic fixtures. Real participant burden, accessibility experience, production behavior, large-scale effects, and independent review remain open.
Required outputs and standing
Demand | State | Evidence anchor |
Context-of-use declaration | met | Specimen boundary and bound parameters |
System and change inventory | met | System identity and G1 → G2 event |
Claim-to-evidence matrix | met | Seven-claim inventory |
Pre-release result | met | 72-case suite |
Bounded field evidence | partial | Scripted rehearsal rather than participant observation |
Monitoring specification | met | Six-category NIST coverage table |
Affected-population evidence | open | Authorized participation required |
Incident and recovery | met | Containment, repair, and replay |
Continue–change–pause decision | met | Revise and repeat synthetic rehearsal |
Coverage ledger | met | Candidate requirement ledger |
Fitting independent review | open | Promotion requirement |
Deviations and stop
The run used a fictional domain rubric in place of a real domain practitioner and scripted sessions in place of participant field evidence. It stopped when each evidence horizon had an observed, planned, or unavailable standing; one revise decision was inspectable; and the remaining promotion gaps were named.
Next step and receiving role
- Candidate decision: focused revision.
- Candidate state after run: candidate.
- Promotion standing: candidate refinement continues; this run supports the next focused revision.
- Next receiver: Research Payload Portfolio steward.
- Next action: incorporate the four schema refinements, then execute one authorized real-world specimen with system, domain, and affected-population review.
- Re-entry event: focused revision applied and an authorized field specimen is available.
- Report boundary: substantive findings live in the separate worked specimen linked above.