Research Payload Family — Dry Runs
research-payload-candidates/vendor-evidence-procurement-renewal-exit@0.1.0
Public dry-run receipt recording the procurement context, immutable candidate input, supplier and local evidence reached, acceptance and exit rehearsals, evidence ceiling, decision, and promotion gaps.
v0.1.0
Receipt standing: accepted as a bounded synthetic dry run. The run produced a substantive worked specimen, exposed focused revisions, and leaves the payload in candidate status.
Payload identity
Field | Receipt |
Semantic identifier | research-payload-candidates/vendor-evidence-procurement-renewal-exit |
Candidate version exercised | 0.1.0 |
Candidate body SHA-256 | 58780383814d30c6361e49b68d9c055d89d35882d3b39527d452a762e439e2a7 |
Candidate body size | 11,437 UTF-8 bytes |
Candidate retrieved | 2026-10-02 |
Candidate route | |
Specimen route |
The digest identifies the candidate body exercised before the focused v0.1.1 refinement. The stable public route continues to resolve the current candidate.
Invocation
Field | Value |
Run ID | VEPRX-DRY-001 |
Run date | 2026-10-02 |
Mode | Public-safe synthetic dry run |
Context | Fictional, low-stakes U.S. federal training and FAQ drafting procurement |
Receiving decision | Retain, sandbox, accept, renew, transition, or exit |
Harness | Multi-agent research and synthesis session using the candidate payload, official public sources, and declared synthetic supplier and local artifacts |
Provider/product | OpenAI Codex |
Model record | GPT-5 family; exact service build unavailable to this durable page |
Tools | Notion workspace operations, public web research, deterministic fixture arithmetic |
Disclosure | Entirely synthetic; inputs comprise fictional supplier artifacts, scripted acceptance checks, and public sources. Vendor, participant, credential, contract, and proprietary data remain outside the run. |
Coverage state
Lifecycle horizon | State | Observable return |
Need and credible alternatives | observed_synthetic | Current, managed, and locally hosted routes |
Supplier evidence | observed_synthetic | Claim-classified fictional evidence inventory |
Accessibility acceptance | observed_synthetic | Named workflow test and export-dialog focus failure |
Material change | observed_synthetic | Citation regression from 12/12 to 10/12 |
Whole-life cost | partial | Visible cost inputs; internal and support costs open |
Portability | partial | Content export present; review and audit events absent |
Deletion | partial | Active-record receipt present; backup evidence open |
Security evidence | unavailable | Fitting independent evidence remains required |
Multidisciplinary review | unavailable | Procurement, technical, accessibility, privacy/data, and domain review remains required |
Material result
The run establishes that the candidate can carry one named need across alternatives, supplier claims, local acceptance tests, contract consequences, operation, renewal, portability, and exit. It kept four evidence gaps explicit and recorded each as open: security evidence, audit export, internal cost, and backup deletion.
Its evidence ceiling is control-flow coherence under declared synthetic supplier and local artifacts. Supplier suitability, contractual enforceability, actual compliance, operational performance, whole-life cost, and successful transition remain for fitting real observations and accountable authorities.
Required outputs and standing
Demand | State | Evidence anchor |
Need and alternative routes | met | Three-route comparison |
Parameter and authority register | met | Bound scenario |
Supplier evidence ledger | met | Nine-item evidence inventory |
Requirement and claim matrix | met | Eight requirement-to-exit traces |
Accessibility acceptance case | met_structurally | Named workflows and remediation condition |
Material-change case | met_structurally | 4.2 → 4.3 regression |
Whole-life cost | partial | Partial illustrative ledger |
Portability rehearsal | partial | Review and audit export open |
Deletion rehearsal | partial | Backup evidence open |
Bounded recommendation | met | Retain current workflow; conditional sandbox only |
Fitting multidisciplinary review | open | Promotion requirement |
Deviations and stop
The run used fictional supplier artifacts and scripted acceptance checks in place of a real market process, contract, system, or accountable review panel. It stopped when every lifecycle stage had a result or open state, three routes remained visible, acceptance and exit tests had recorded standings, and the remaining promotion gaps were named.
Next step and receiving role
- Candidate decision: focused revision.
- Candidate state after run: candidate.
- Promotion standing: candidate refinement continues; this run supports the next focused revision.
- Next receiver: Research Payload Portfolio steward.
- Next action: incorporate the four schema refinements, then execute one instrumented run with procurement, technical, accessibility, privacy/data, and domain receivers.
- Re-entry event: focused revision applied and a fitting reviewed instrumented run is available.
- Report boundary: substantive findings live in the separate worked specimen linked above.